I apply the attached patch.
2012-10-05 François Dumont
* include/ext/throw_allocator.h (__throw_value_base): Add move
semantic, not throwing.
(__throw_value_limit): Likewise.
(__throw_value_random): Likewise.
* testsuite/util/exception/safety.h: Add validation of C++11
On 4 November 2012 16:01, Jonathan Wakely wrote:
> On 3 November 2012 19:05, Paolo Carlini wrote:
>>
>> On 11/03/2012 03:43 PM, François Dumont wrote:
>>>
>>> Note that I run exception tests to validate it and the recently introduced
>>> 23_containers/forward_list/allocator/noexcept.cc test doesn't
Ooh, I almost forgot, please remember to update the copyright years in
the changed files. For trunk you can change them to ranges like
2005-2012
On 4 November 2012 16:01, Jonathan Wakely wrote:
> On 3 November 2012 19:05, Paolo Carlini wrote:
>>
>> On 11/03/2012 03:43 PM, François Dumont wrote:
On 3 November 2012 19:05, Paolo Carlini wrote:
>
> On 11/03/2012 03:43 PM, François Dumont wrote:
>>
>> Note that I run exception tests to validate it and the recently introduced
>> 23_containers/forward_list/allocator/noexcept.cc test doesn't work in debug
>> mode. I think it needs a dg-require-no
Hi,
On 11/03/2012 03:43 PM, François Dumont wrote:
On 11/03/2012 03:12 PM, Jonathan Wakely wrote:
On 3 November 2012 14:11, Jonathan Wakely wrote:
On 3 November 2012 13:53, François Dumont wrote:
Here is an updated proposal using default implementations as much as
possible.
Please check the i
On 11/03/2012 03:12 PM, Jonathan Wakely wrote:
On 3 November 2012 14:11, Jonathan Wakely wrote:
On 3 November 2012 13:53, François Dumont wrote:
Here is an updated proposal using default implementations as much as
possible.
Please check the indentation of the "struct emplace_point" specializat
On 3 November 2012 14:11, Jonathan Wakely wrote:
> On 3 November 2012 13:53, François Dumont wrote:
>> Here is an updated proposal using default implementations as much as
>> possible.
>
> Please check the indentation of the "struct emplace_point" specializations.
>
> In testsuite/util/testsuite_co
On 3 November 2012 13:53, François Dumont wrote:
> Here is an updated proposal using default implementations as much as
> possible.
Please check the indentation of the "struct emplace_point" specializations.
In testsuite/util/testsuite_container_traits.h
+#ifdef __GXX_EXPERIMENTAL_CXX0X__
+
On 09/28/2012 10:14 PM, François Dumont wrote:
Hi
I enhance scope of the small exception safety test framework used
to validate different levels of exception safety through the
containers operations. I have added calls to C++ methods
emplace/emplace_front/emplace_back/emplace_hint in C++1
