On Fri, Nov 4, 2011 at 1:02 AM, Andrew Pinski wrote:
> On Thu, Nov 3, 2011 at 4:59 PM, Andrew MacLeod wrote:
>> wow, that could be a lot of work. Is that really what every branch merge
>> does?
>
> Yes, I did just that for the pointer plus merge and Daniel did it for
> the DF merge (which was mu
On Thu, Nov 3, 2011 at 4:59 PM, Andrew MacLeod wrote:
> wow, that could be a lot of work. Is that really what every branch merge
> does?
Yes, I did just that for the pointer plus merge and Daniel did it for
the DF merge (which was much bigger).
Thanks,
Andrew Pinski
On 11/03/2011 07:54 PM, Joseph S. Myers wrote:
On Thu, 3 Nov 2011, Andrew MacLeod wrote:
Whats the deal on Changelogs? Do we just put the entire branch changelog at
the top of the current changelog with a comment 'merged from cxx-mem-model'
or something to that effect? It just buggers up the
On Thu, 3 Nov 2011, Andrew MacLeod wrote:
> Whats the deal on Changelogs? Do we just put the entire branch changelog at
> the top of the current changelog with a comment 'merged from cxx-mem-model'
> or something to that effect? It just buggers up the date linearality of
> changelogs. Or do I
