Re: collect2.exe errors not pruned

2020-06-11 Thread Jeff Law via Gcc-patches
On Wed, 2020-06-10 at 23:41 -0300, Alexandre Oliva wrote: > On May 26, 2020, Alexandre Oliva wrote: > > > On May 19, 2020, Joseph Myers wrote: > > > Allowing a missing executable name is reasonable enough, but I was > > > actually thinking that the messages should print "gcc" or whatever > > >

Re: collect2.exe errors not pruned

2020-06-10 Thread Alexandre Oliva
On May 26, 2020, Alexandre Oliva wrote: > On May 19, 2020, Joseph Myers wrote: >> Allowing a missing executable name is reasonable enough, but I was >> actually thinking that the messages should print "gcc" or whatever command >> the user ran in place of "collect2". > Should we make the rege

Re: collect2.exe errors not pruned

2020-05-25 Thread Alexandre Oliva
On May 19, 2020, Joseph Myers wrote: > On Tue, 19 May 2020, Alexandre Oliva wrote: >> > I don't think the error should mention .exe, but I also don't think the >> > error should mention collect2 (see what I said in >> > , the existence

Re: collect2.exe errors not pruned

2020-05-19 Thread Joseph Myers
On Tue, 19 May 2020, Alexandre Oliva wrote: > > I don't think the error should mention .exe, but I also don't think the > > error should mention collect2 (see what I said in > > , the existence > > of collect2 is an implementation detail

Re: collect2.exe errors not pruned

2020-05-19 Thread Alexandre Oliva
Hello, Joseph, Andrew, Thanks for your feedback. On Feb 28, 2020, Joseph Myers wrote: > On Fri, 28 Feb 2020, Alexandre Oliva wrote: >> I'm not sure it's appropriate for the error to not omit the host >> platform's executable suffix, just as it omits directory components from >> argv[0], so I'm

Re: collect2.exe errors not pruned

2020-02-28 Thread Joseph Myers
On Fri, 28 Feb 2020, Alexandre Oliva wrote: > I'm not sure it's appropriate for the error to not omit the host > platform's executable suffix, just as it omits directory components from > argv[0], so I'm undecided between fixing collect2.c's initialization of > progname or extending the regexp, as

Re: collect2.exe errors not pruned

2020-02-27 Thread Andrew Pinski
On Thu, Feb 27, 2020 at 9:17 PM Alexandre Oliva wrote: > > > Testing on platforms with an executable suffix gets a few excess output > failures because e.g. collect2.exe errors do not get pruned. > > I'm not sure it's appropriate for the error to not omit the host > platform's executable suffix, j