These are statistically significant differences: increasing by 0.23%
for the version 4.8.0, increasing by 0.21% for the version 4.8.1,
decreasing by 0.686% for trunk.
These are new row numbers:
2013-11-05 Roman Gareev :
> 2013/10/31 Florian Weimer :
>> On 10/20/2013 02:55 PM, Roman Gareev wrote:
2013/10/31 Florian Weimer :
> On 10/20/2013 02:55 PM, Roman Gareev wrote:
>>
>> During testing of the linux kernel (3.8.8) compilation time, the
>> acquired results were the following: increasing by 0.17% for the
>> version 4.8.0, increasing by 1.12% for the version 4.8.1, decreasing
>> by 0.598% f
2013/10/20 Ondřej Bílka :
> On Sun, Oct 20, 2013 at 06:55:40PM +0600, Roman Gareev wrote:
>> Dear gcc contributors,
>>
>> Recently I came across the list of "ideas for speeding up GCC"
>> (http://gcc.gnu.org/wiki/Speedup_areas). Among others, there was
>> suggested to replace identifier hash table
On 10/20/2013 02:55 PM, Roman Gareev wrote:
During testing of the linux kernel (3.8.8) compilation time, the
acquired results were the following: increasing by 0.17% for the
version 4.8.0, increasing by 1.12% for the version 4.8.1, decreasing
by 0.598% for trunk (this are average values).
Can y
On Sun, Oct 20, 2013 at 06:55:40PM +0600, Roman Gareev wrote:
> Dear gcc contributors,
>
> Recently I came across the list of "ideas for speeding up GCC"
> (http://gcc.gnu.org/wiki/Speedup_areas). Among others, there was
> suggested to replace identifier hash table with other data structure.
>
>
