On Thu, 14 Jan 2021 at 19:57, Alexandre Oliva wrote:
>
> On Jan 14, 2021, Jonathan Wakely wrote:
>
> >> + /* Got for some 10 cycles, but we're already past that and still
>
> > I can't parse "Got for some 10 cycles". If that's just a typo
>
> Yeah, I meant "Go for ... but if ..." and managed
On Jan 14, 2021, Jonathan Wakely wrote:
>> + /* Got for some 10 cycles, but we're already past that and still
> I can't parse "Got for some 10 cycles". If that's just a typo
Yeah, I meant "Go for ... but if ..." and managed to double-mangle it.
Thanks for spotting it. Here's the patch I'm
On 05/01/21 04:44 -0300, Alexandre Oliva wrote:
We get occasional failures of 30_threads/future/members/poll.cc
on some platforms whose high resolution clock doesn't have such a high
resolution; wait_for_0 ends up as 0, and then some asserts fail as
intervals measured as longer than zero are tes
On Jan 5, 2021, Alexandre Oliva wrote:
> We get occasional failures of 30_threads/future/members/poll.cc
> on some platforms whose high resolution clock doesn't have such a high
> resolution; wait_for_0 ends up as 0, and then some asserts fail as
> intervals measured as longer than zero are test
