On Fri, Mar 4, 2011 at 12:29 AM, Alan Modra wrote:
> On Thu, Mar 03, 2011 at 04:43:15PM +0100, Richard Guenther wrote:
>> On Thu, Mar 3, 2011 at 4:42 PM, Richard Guenther
>> wrote:
>> > On Thu, Mar 3, 2011 at 3:33 PM, Alan Modra wrote:
>> >> TREE_ADDRESSABLE comment says "In a FUNCTION_DECL, non
On Fri, Mar 4, 2011 at 5:58 AM, Alan Modra wrote:
> Warn off anyone trying to do as I did, and the bit about inlines is
> no longer relevant. OK to apply?
>
> * tree.h (TREE_ADDRESSABLE): Note that direct calls set the
> flag on FUNCTION_DECLs.
>
> Index: gcc/tree.h
> ==
Warn off anyone trying to do as I did, and the bit about inlines is
no longer relevant. OK to apply?
* tree.h (TREE_ADDRESSABLE): Note that direct calls set the
flag on FUNCTION_DECLs.
Index: gcc/tree.h
===
--- gcc/t
On Thu, Mar 03, 2011 at 04:43:15PM +0100, Richard Guenther wrote:
> On Thu, Mar 3, 2011 at 4:42 PM, Richard Guenther
> wrote:
> > On Thu, Mar 3, 2011 at 3:33 PM, Alan Modra wrote:
> >> TREE_ADDRESSABLE comment says "In a FUNCTION_DECL, nonzero means its
> >> address is needed". However, as I poi
On Thu, Mar 3, 2011 at 4:42 PM, Richard Guenther
wrote:
> On Thu, Mar 3, 2011 at 3:33 PM, Alan Modra wrote:
>> TREE_ADDRESSABLE comment says "In a FUNCTION_DECL, nonzero means its
>> address is needed". However, as I point out in
>> http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2011-02/msg01525.html, this f
On Thu, Mar 3, 2011 at 3:33 PM, Alan Modra wrote:
> TREE_ADDRESSABLE comment says "In a FUNCTION_DECL, nonzero means its
> address is needed". However, as I point out in
> http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2011-02/msg01525.html, this flag
> gets set when making normal calls. It wasn't always lik
