Re: arm: Prevent ICE when doloop dec_set is not PLUS_EXPR

On 7/31/24 18:06, Andre Vieira (lists) wrote: This patch refactors and fixes an issue where arm_mve_dlstp_check_dec_counter     was making an assumption about the form of what a candidate for a dec_insn     should be, which caused an ICE.     This dec_insn is the instruction that decrease

Re: arm: Prevent ICE when doloop dec_set is not PLUS_EXPR

This patch refactors and fixes an issue where arm_mve_dlstp_check_dec_counter was making an assumption about the form of what a candidate for a dec_insn should be, which caused an ICE. This dec_insn is the instruction that decreases the loop counter inside a decrementing loop a

Re: arm: Prevent ICE when doloop dec_set is not PLUS_EXPR

Hi Andre, On 7/31/24 11:29, Andre Vieira (lists) wrote: Hi Christophe, Thanks for the comments, attached new version for testcase, see below new cover letter: Thanks for the improved cover letter, it is indeed clearer. This patch refactors and fixes an issue where arm_mve_dlstp_check_dec

Re: arm: Prevent ICE when doloop dec_set is not PLUS_EXPR

Hi Christophe, Thanks for the comments, attached new version for testcase, see below new cover letter: This patch refactors and fixes an issue where arm_mve_dlstp_check_dec_counter was making an assumption about the form of what a candidate for a dec_insn. This dec_insn is the instruction th

Re: arm: Prevent ICE when doloop dec_set is not PLUS_EXPR

Hi Andre, On 7/26/24 16:05, Andre Vieira (lists) wrote: This patch refactors and fixes an issue where arm_mve_dlstp_check_dec_counter was making an assumption about the form of what a candidate for a dec_insn. I think this lacks some verb? (eg what a candidate for a dec_insn "is" or "