On Wed, Dec 13, 2017 at 04:42:02PM +, Jeff Law wrote:
> On 11/17/2017 08:38 AM, Richard Sandiford wrote:
> > This patch adds support for fully-masking loops that require peeling
> > for gaps. It peels exactly one scalar iteration and uses the masked
> > loop to handle the rest. Previously we
On 11/17/2017 08:38 AM, Richard Sandiford wrote:
> This patch adds support for fully-masking loops that require peeling
> for gaps. It peels exactly one scalar iteration and uses the masked
> loop to handle the rest. Previously we would fall back on using a
> standard unmasked loop instead.
>
>
