Re: Updating the backend status for h8300 on the wiki

2020-12-07 Thread Eric Botcazou
> I noticed that as well. OK, now corrected. -- Eric Botcazou

Re: Updating the backend status for h8300 on the wiki

2020-12-07 Thread John Paul Adrian Glaubitz
On 12/7/20 9:06 AM, Eric Botcazou wrote: >> Now there are only AVR and CR16 that need to be converted. Great progress! > > Indeed, but why does CR16 not have the 'c' letter then? I noticed that as well. Adrian -- .''`. John Paul Adrian Glaubitz : :' : Debian Developer - glaub...@debian.org

Re: Updating the backend status for h8300 on the wiki

2020-12-07 Thread Eric Botcazou
> Now there are only AVR and CR16 that need to be converted. Great progress! Indeed, but why does CR16 not have the 'c' letter then? -- Eric Botcazou

Re: Updating the backend status for h8300 on the wiki

2020-12-06 Thread Maciej W. Rozycki
On Sat, 5 Dec 2020, John Paul Adrian Glaubitz wrote: > Now that VAX has been converted as well, the entry can be updated here > as well. I've done that already. Maciej

Re: Updating the backend status for h8300 on the wiki

2020-12-05 Thread John Paul Adrian Glaubitz
Hi Jeff! On 11/30/20 8:22 PM, Jeff Law wrote: > I also took care of updating cris and mn103 status WRT cc0. Attached is > what was pushed to the gcc-wwwdocs trunk. Now that VAX has been converted as well, the entry can be updated here as well. Now there are only AVR and CR16 that need to be con

Re: Updating the backend status for h8300 on the wiki

2020-11-30 Thread Jeff Law via Gcc-patches
On 11/30/20 7:37 AM, John Paul Adrian Glaubitz wrote: > Hi! > > Now that h8300 has been converted to use MODE_CC, it might be a good idea > to update the documentation on the wiki [1] which still lists h8300 as > being cc0. Thanks.  I'd been meaning to update that. I also took care of updating c