Renlin Li writes:
> Hi,
>
> On 08/06/16 11:21, Andreas Schwab wrote:
>> Jan Hubicka writes:
>>
>>> Bootstrapped/regtested x86_64-linux, will commit it later today.
>>
>> FAIL: gcc.dg/tree-ssa/slsr-8.c scan-tree-dump-times optimized " w?* " 7
>
> This fails for all arm and aarch64 targets as
Hi,
On 08/06/16 11:21, Andreas Schwab wrote:
Jan Hubicka writes:
Bootstrapped/regtested x86_64-linux, will commit it later today.
FAIL: gcc.dg/tree-ssa/slsr-8.c scan-tree-dump-times optimized " w?* " 7
This fails for all arm and aarch64 targets as well since the commit.
Regards,
Renl
Hi Honza,
On 07/06/16 20:27, Jan Hubicka wrote:
Hello,
Maritn Liska measured branch predictor hitrates on current tree and SPEC2006.
CPU2006
HEURISTICS BRANCHES (REL) HITRATE
COVERAGE COVERAGE (REL)
loop iv compare33 0.1
> On 06/07/2016 09:27 PM, Jan Hubicka wrote:
> > There are bugs in few predictors - goto predictor is dead because the FE
> > code was dropped,
> > return predictor is bit random because CFG is optimized (it should probably
> > be done in FE),
> > loop iv compare seems bogus and fortran fail allo
On 06/07/2016 09:27 PM, Jan Hubicka wrote:
> There are bugs in few predictors - goto predictor is dead because the FE code
> was dropped,
> return predictor is bit random because CFG is optimized (it should probably
> be done in FE),
> loop iv compare seems bogus and fortran fail alloc does not s
On Wed, Jun 8, 2016 at 2:50 PM, Jan Hubicka wrote:
>> On Wed, Jun 8, 2016 at 2:35 PM, Jan Hubicka wrote:
>> >> On 06/08/2016 12:21 PM, Andreas Schwab wrote:
>> >> > Jan Hubicka writes:
>> >> >
>> >> >> Bootstrapped/regtested x86_64-linux, will commit it later today.
>> >> >
>> >> > FAIL: gcc.dg/
> On Wed, Jun 8, 2016 at 2:35 PM, Jan Hubicka wrote:
> >> On 06/08/2016 12:21 PM, Andreas Schwab wrote:
> >> > Jan Hubicka writes:
> >> >
> >> >> Bootstrapped/regtested x86_64-linux, will commit it later today.
> >> >
> >> > FAIL: gcc.dg/tree-ssa/slsr-8.c scan-tree-dump-times optimized " w?*
On Wed, Jun 8, 2016 at 2:35 PM, Jan Hubicka wrote:
>> On 06/08/2016 12:21 PM, Andreas Schwab wrote:
>> > Jan Hubicka writes:
>> >
>> >> Bootstrapped/regtested x86_64-linux, will commit it later today.
>> >
>> > FAIL: gcc.dg/tree-ssa/slsr-8.c scan-tree-dump-times optimized " w?* " 7
>> >
>> >
> On 06/08/2016 12:21 PM, Andreas Schwab wrote:
> > Jan Hubicka writes:
> >
> >> Bootstrapped/regtested x86_64-linux, will commit it later today.
> >
> > FAIL: gcc.dg/tree-ssa/slsr-8.c scan-tree-dump-times optimized " w?* " 7
> >
> > Andreas.
> >
>
> Hi.
>
> It's caused by a different pr
On 06/08/2016 12:21 PM, Andreas Schwab wrote:
> Jan Hubicka writes:
>
>> Bootstrapped/regtested x86_64-linux, will commit it later today.
>
> FAIL: gcc.dg/tree-ssa/slsr-8.c scan-tree-dump-times optimized " w?* " 7
>
> Andreas.
>
Hi.
It's caused by a different probabilities for BB 2:
@@
> On 06/07/2016 09:27 PM, Jan Hubicka wrote:
> > There are bugs in few predictors - goto predictor is dead because the FE
> > code was dropped,
> > return predictor is bit random because CFG is optimized (it should probably
> > be done in FE),
> > loop iv compare seems bogus and fortran fail allo
On 06/07/2016 09:27 PM, Jan Hubicka wrote:
> There are bugs in few predictors - goto predictor is dead because the FE code
> was dropped,
> return predictor is bit random because CFG is optimized (it should probably
> be done in FE),
> loop iv compare seems bogus and fortran fail alloc does not s
Jan Hubicka writes:
> Bootstrapped/regtested x86_64-linux, will commit it later today.
FAIL: gcc.dg/tree-ssa/slsr-8.c scan-tree-dump-times optimized " w?* " 7
Andreas.
--
Andreas Schwab, SUSE Labs, sch...@suse.de
GPG Key fingerprint = 0196 BAD8 1CE9 1970 F4BE 1748 E4D4 88E3 0EEA B9D7
"An
13 matches
Mail list logo
