Re: Unreviewed patch

2018-05-25 Thread Richard Biener
On Fri, May 25, 2018 at 12:57 AM Rainer Orth wrote: > The following patch has remained unreviewed for two weeks: > [build] Support SHF_EXCLUDE on non-x86 and with Solaris as > https://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2018-05/msg00465.html > Most of it falls under my Solaris maintain

Re: Unreviewed patch

2016-12-12 Thread Jakub Jelinek
On Mon, Dec 12, 2016 at 01:54:41PM +0100, FX wrote: > > The following patch has remained unreviewed for a week: > > > > [build] Disable hwcaps on libgfortran > >https://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2016-12/msg00336.html > > > > It is required to unbreak bootstrap on Solaris/x86 and, tho

Re: Unreviewed patch

2016-12-12 Thread FX
> The following patch has remained unreviewed for a week: > > [build] Disable hwcaps on libgfortran >https://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2016-12/msg00336.html > > It is required to unbreak bootstrap on Solaris/x86 and, though touching > both libgfortran and libitm, probably needs pri

Re: Unreviewed patch

2016-04-13 Thread Jeff Law
On 04/06/2016 04:58 AM, Rainer Orth wrote: The following patch has remainded unreviewed for a week: [testsuite, sparcv9] Fix gcc.dg/ifcvt-4.c on 64-bit SPARC (PR rtl-optimization/68749) https://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2016-03/msg01631.html Although it's testsuite-only, I'm q

Re: Unreviewed patch

2015-11-09 Thread Rainer Orth
Jeff Law writes: > On 11/06/2015 06:29 AM, Rainer Orth wrote: >> The following patch has remained unrevied for a month: >> >> [build] Support init priority on Solaris >> https://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2015-10/msg00716.html >> >> It needs build and ia64 maintainers and someone fa

Re: Unreviewed patch

2015-11-06 Thread Jeff Law
On 11/06/2015 06:29 AM, Rainer Orth wrote: The following patch has remained unrevied for a month: [build] Support init priority on Solaris https://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2015-10/msg00716.html It needs build and ia64 maintainers and someone familiar with the init priority su

Re: Unreviewed Patch

2014-05-16 Thread Jeff Law
On 02/22/14 16:07, rbmj wrote: Hi all, Just a ping, I haven't gotten anything back on this patch: http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2014-02/msg00621.html The patch needs to be tested by bootstrapping on another platform and performing a regression test.Most folks use an x86_64 linux system

Re: Unreviewed Patch

2014-02-25 Thread rbmj
On 25-Feb-14 01:21, Jeff Law wrote: I think this should be queued until after 4.9 branches. It's adding a new capability (posix threading on vxworks), not fixing a bug and certainly not fixing a regression AFAICT. Fair enough. It just seems somewhat trivial to me, as it doesn't add any funct

Re: Unreviewed Patch

2014-02-24 Thread Jeff Law
On 02/22/14 16:07, rbmj wrote: Hi all, Just a ping, I haven't gotten anything back on this patch: http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2014-02/msg00621.html I think this should be queued until after 4.9 branches. It's adding a new capability (posix threading on vxworks), not fixing a bug and cer