On 10/06/2011 12:21 PM, Rainer Orth wrote:
> Can you post an updated patch for this one? I'll try to review the others
> as soon as possible.
Do you see a change to get the other patches reviewed before stage1
closes? I'd like to get them into 4.7 rather than carry them forward
for several m
Paolo Bonzini writes:
> On 09/22/2011 08:18 PM, Rainer Orth wrote:
>> [build] Move gthr to toplevel libgcc
>> http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2011-08/msg00762.html
>
> Can you post an updated patch for this one? I'll try to review the others
> as soon as possible.
Do you see a c
On 09/22/2011 08:18 PM, Rainer Orth wrote:
[build] Move gthr to toplevel libgcc
http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2011-08/msg00762.html
Can you post an updated patch for this one? I'll try to review the
others as soon as possible.
Paolo
NightStrike writes:
> On Mon, Jul 18, 2011 at 8:21 AM, Rainer Orth
> wrote:
>> The following two libgcc patches have seen almost no comments, and
>> certainly neither testing or review in a week:
>>
>> CFT: [build] Move fp-bit support to toplevel libgcc
>> http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc
On Mon, Jul 18, 2011 at 8:21 AM, Rainer Orth
wrote:
> The following two libgcc patches have seen almost no comments, and
> certainly neither testing or review in a week:
>
> CFT: [build] Move fp-bit support to toplevel libgcc
> http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2011-07/msg00927.html
