On 05/25/11 02:29, Vladimir Makarov wrote:
>> http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2011-05/msg00750.html
> Ok. But changelog entry for sched_change_pattern is absent.
I've committed this with a slight change in sched_change_pattern;
another patch I'm working on showed a need to also clear the cached
I noticed that this approval had not been sent to the mailing list. I'm
restesting and checking in the remaining preliminary patches for C6X now.
Bernd
Original Message
Subject: Re: The TI C6X port
Date: Wed, 25 May 2011 17:11:53 -0400
From: Vladimir Makarov
To: Bernd Sc
On 05/25/2011 12:29 AM, Vladimir Makarov wrote:
> So I need to finish review of the 4th patch (I hope to finish it
> tomorrow). All other patches is ok.
Thanks, Vlad. I'm trickling them in now.
>> http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2011-05/msg00755.html
>>
> Ok. Only changelog entry for deps_anal
On 11-05-23 5:45 AM, Bernd Schmidt wrote:
Ping: C6X scheduler changes.
http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2011-05/msg00747.html
I think it is ok. I spent a lot of time looking at the change. It
looks ok to me although it is hard to be sure because the code is too
complicated. So it is good t
Ping: C6X scheduler changes.
http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2011-05/msg00747.html
http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2011-05/msg00749.html
http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2011-05/msg00750.html
http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2011-05/msg00753.html
http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2011-05/msg
On Wed, 11 May 2011, Bernd Schmidt wrote:
> On 05/10/2011 06:51 PM, Joseph S. Myers wrote:
> > On Tue, 10 May 2011, Bernd Schmidt wrote:
> >
> >> Binutils and uClibc already contain C6X patches; unfortunately there
> >> isn't an open-source sim.
> >
> > The newlib support is also upstream.
> >
On 05/10/2011 06:51 PM, Joseph S. Myers wrote:
> On Tue, 10 May 2011, Bernd Schmidt wrote:
>
>> Binutils and uClibc already contain C6X patches; unfortunately there
>> isn't an open-source sim.
>
> The newlib support is also upstream.
>
>> I've also run c6x tests, which look fairly clean on the
On Tue, 10 May 2011, Bernd Schmidt wrote:
> Binutils and uClibc already contain C6X patches; unfortunately there
> isn't an open-source sim.
The newlib support is also upstream.
> I've also run c6x tests, which look fairly clean on the whole.
Does this testing cover all six architecture variant
