On 01/22/2016 10:21 AM, Bernd Schmidt wrote:
On 01/22/2016 02:37 PM, Andrew MacLeod wrote:
/* If the initializer is non-void, then it's a normal expression
that will be assigned to the slot. */
(*) if (!VOID_TYPE_P (t))
(*) return RECURSE (t);
I suspect
On 01/22/2016 04:03 AM, Richard Biener wrote:
My guess is this is probably suppose to be
&& ! VOID_TYPE_P (TREE_TYPE (TREE_OPERAND (tem, 1)))
&& ! VOID_TYPE_P (TREE_TYPE (TREE_OPERAND (tem, 2)))
but I'm not sure. Any guesses whats intended here?
Not sure, it might be to detect some of the
On 01/22/2016 02:37 PM, Andrew MacLeod wrote:
/* If the initializer is non-void, then it's a normal expression
that will be assigned to the slot. */
(*) if (!VOID_TYPE_P (t))
(*) return RECURSE (t);
I suspect this should also be
if (!VOID_TYPE_P(TREE_TYPE
On 01/22/2016 06:03 AM, Richard Biener wrote:
On Fri, Jan 22, 2016 at 12:06 AM, Andrew MacLeod wrote:
I was trying the ttype prototype for static type checking on fold-const.c to
see how long it would take me to convert such a large file, and it choked on
this snippet of code in fold_unary_loc,
On Fri, Jan 22, 2016 at 12:06 AM, Andrew MacLeod wrote:
> I was trying the ttype prototype for static type checking on fold-const.c to
> see how long it would take me to convert such a large file, and it choked on
> this snippet of code in fold_unary_loc, around lines 7690-7711:
>
> suspect code t
