Re: Split out OMP constructs' SIMD clone supporting code (was: Splitting up gcc/omp-low.c?)

Hi! On Fri, 15 Apr 2016 14:15:42 +0200, Jakub Jelinek wrote: > On Fri, Apr 15, 2016 at 02:11:45PM +0200, Thomas Schwinge wrote: > > On Fri, 15 Apr 2016 13:57:05 +0200, Jakub Jelinek wrote: > > > On Fri, Apr 15, 2016 at 01:53:14PM +0200, Thomas Schwinge wrote: > > > > For all the other splitting

Re: Split out OMP constructs' SIMD clone supporting code (was: Splitting up gcc/omp-low.c?)

On Fri, Apr 15, 2016 at 02:11:45PM +0200, Thomas Schwinge wrote: > Hi! > > On Fri, 15 Apr 2016 13:57:05 +0200, Jakub Jelinek wrote: > > On Fri, Apr 15, 2016 at 01:53:14PM +0200, Thomas Schwinge wrote: > > > For all the other splitting patches that I have posted/proposed, the idea > > > then is to

Re: Split out OMP constructs' SIMD clone supporting code (was: Splitting up gcc/omp-low.c?)

Hi! On Fri, 15 Apr 2016 13:57:05 +0200, Jakub Jelinek wrote: > On Fri, Apr 15, 2016 at 01:53:14PM +0200, Thomas Schwinge wrote: > > For all the other splitting patches that I have posted/proposed, the idea > > then is to commit these onto both gcc-6-branch and trunk? > > If we branch today, then

Re: Split out OMP constructs' SIMD clone supporting code (was: Splitting up gcc/omp-low.c?)

On Fri, Apr 15, 2016 at 01:53:14PM +0200, Thomas Schwinge wrote: > Hi! > > On Fri, 15 Apr 2016 13:15:07 +0200, Jakub Jelinek wrote: > > On Thu, Apr 14, 2016 at 10:27:40PM +0200, Thomas Schwinge wrote: > > > On Thu, 14 Apr 2016 18:01:13 +0200, I wrote: > > > > "simdclone" pass, with the > > > > re

Re: Split out OMP constructs' SIMD clone supporting code (was: Splitting up gcc/omp-low.c?)

Hi! On Fri, 15 Apr 2016 13:15:07 +0200, Jakub Jelinek wrote: > On Thu, Apr 14, 2016 at 10:27:40PM +0200, Thomas Schwinge wrote: > > On Thu, 14 Apr 2016 18:01:13 +0200, I wrote: > > > "simdclone" pass, with the > > > respective supporting code. I will certainly submit line-diff patches if > > > w

Re: Split out OMP constructs' SIMD clone supporting code (was: Splitting up gcc/omp-low.c?)

On Thu, Apr 14, 2016 at 10:27:40PM +0200, Thomas Schwinge wrote: > On Thu, 14 Apr 2016 18:01:13 +0200, I wrote: > > "simdclone" pass, with the > > respective supporting code. I will certainly submit line-diff patches if > > we agree that this is sound -- these two may actually be good candidates >

Re: Split out OMP constructs' SIMD clone supporting code

Hi! On Thu, 14 Apr 2016 22:27:40 +0200, I wrote: > On Thu, 14 Apr 2016 18:01:13 +0200, I wrote: > > "simdclone" pass, with the > > respective supporting code. I will certainly submit line-diff patches if > > we agree that this is sound -- these two may actually be good candidates > > to do first,