Re: Revert Sphinx documentation [Was: Issues with Sphinx]

2022-11-15 Thread Martin Liška
On 11/14/22 14:06, Gerald Pfeifer wrote: > On Mon, 14 Nov 2022, Martin Liška wrote: >> The situation with the Sphinx migration went out of control. The TODO >> list overwhelmed me and there are road-blocks that can't be easily fixed >> with what Sphinx currently supports. > > This migration was/

Re: Revert Sphinx documentation [Was: Issues with Sphinx]

2022-11-14 Thread Gerald Pfeifer
On Mon, 14 Nov 2022, Jonathan Wakely wrote: > I formatted my new region/endregion pragmas on one line because that > seemed to be how it should be done for rSt, e.g. we had: > > ``#pragma GCC push_options`` ``#pragma GCC pop_options`` > > But I think the attached patch is more correct for how we

Re: Revert Sphinx documentation [Was: Issues with Sphinx]

2022-11-14 Thread Gerald Pfeifer
On Mon, 14 Nov 2022, Martin Liška wrote: > The situation with the Sphinx migration went out of control. The TODO > list overwhelmed me and there are road-blocks that can't be easily fixed > with what Sphinx currently supports. This migration was/is a huge and complex undertaking, and you have be

Re: Revert Sphinx documentation [Was: Issues with Sphinx]

2022-11-14 Thread Jonathan Wakely via Gcc-patches
On Mon, 14 Nov 2022 at 08:40, Martin Liška wrote: > > On 11/14/22 03:49, Martin Liška wrote: > > I'm going to revert the patchset during today (Monday) and I'll send a > > patch with a couple > > of new changes that landed in the period of time we used Sphinx. > > The revert is done and I included

Re: Revert Sphinx documentation [Was: Issues with Sphinx]

2022-11-14 Thread Martin Liška
On 11/14/22 03:49, Martin Liška wrote: > I'm going to revert the patchset during today (Monday) and I'll send a patch > with a couple > of new changes that landed in the period of time we used Sphinx. The revert is done and I included ce51e8439a491910348a1c5aea43b55f000ba8ac commit that ports al