On 05/28/14 13:50, Richard Sandiford wrote:
Thanks for the review.
Jeff Law writes:
On 05/26/14 13:21, Richard Sandiford wrote:
If we're going to change it, then clearly the docs need to change and
ideally we'd statically check the port's constraints during the build
process to ensure they me
Thanks for the review.
Jeff Law writes:
> On 05/26/14 13:21, Richard Sandiford wrote:
>>> If we're going to change it, then clearly the docs need to change and
>>> ideally we'd statically check the port's constraints during the build
>>> process to ensure they meet the tighter definition.
>>
>> O
On 05/26/14 13:21, Richard Sandiford wrote:
If we're going to change it, then clearly the docs need to change and
ideally we'd statically check the port's constraints during the build
process to ensure they meet the tighter definition.
OK, how does this look? I built a cc1 for one target per c
