Re: Rename cxx1998 into normal

2017-10-26 Thread Jonathan Wakely
On 26/10/17 21:45 +0200, François Dumont wrote: On 26/10/2017 19:09, Jonathan Wakely wrote: On 26/10/17 18:55 +0200, Daniel Krügler wrote: 2017-10-26 7:51 GMT+02:00 François Dumont : Hi     We once talk about rename the __cxx1998 namespace into something less C++98 biased. Here is the patch

Re: Rename cxx1998 into normal

2017-10-26 Thread François Dumont
On 26/10/2017 19:09, Jonathan Wakely wrote: On 26/10/17 18:55 +0200, Daniel Krügler wrote: 2017-10-26 7:51 GMT+02:00 François Dumont : Hi     We once talk about rename the __cxx1998 namespace into something less C++98 biased. Here is the patch to do so.     Ok with the new name ? IMO the

Re: Rename cxx1998 into normal

2017-10-26 Thread Jonathan Wakely
On 26/10/17 18:55 +0200, Daniel Krügler wrote: 2017-10-26 7:51 GMT+02:00 François Dumont : Hi We once talk about rename the __cxx1998 namespace into something less C++98 biased. Here is the patch to do so. Ok with the new name ? IMO the name should somehow still contain "cxx" somewhe

Re: Rename cxx1998 into normal

2017-10-26 Thread Daniel Krügler
2017-10-26 7:51 GMT+02:00 François Dumont : > Hi > > We once talk about rename the __cxx1998 namespace into something less > C++98 biased. Here is the patch to do so. > > Ok with the new name ? IMO the name should somehow still contain "cxx" somewhere, otherwise this could easily cause a s