Re: Removing target-libiberty (was: Re: Libiberty: POSIXify psignal definition)

2011-06-22 Thread Hans-Peter Nilsson
> Date: Wed, 22 Jun 2011 20:16:48 +0200 > From: Hans-Peter Nilsson > > PR47836 > PR23656 > PR47733 > PR49247 > * configure.ac (target_libraries): Remove target-libiberty. ... JFTR, that's not proper PR annotation. I changed it as obvious to the following, which en

Re: Removing target-libiberty (was: Re: Libiberty: POSIXify psignal definition)

2011-06-22 Thread DJ Delorie
> Ok for trunk? Ok with me. I'll let the branch maintainers decide if they want it for their branches.

Re: Removing target-libiberty (was: Re: Libiberty: POSIXify psignal definition)

2011-06-22 Thread Hans-Peter Nilsson
> Date: Mon, 20 Jun 2011 16:58:41 + (UTC) > From: "Joseph S. Myers" > On Mon, 20 Jun 2011, Hans-Peter Nilsson wrote: > > > It seems none in approval capacity have any objection to > > (figuratively) s/target-libiberty//g in toplevel/configure.ac on > > all branches. Is an --enable-target-li

Re: Removing target-libiberty (was: Re: Libiberty: POSIXify psignal definition)

2011-06-20 Thread Joseph S. Myers
On Mon, 20 Jun 2011, Hans-Peter Nilsson wrote: > It seems none in approval capacity have any objection to > (figuratively) s/target-libiberty//g in toplevel/configure.ac on > all branches. Is an --enable-target-libiberty or > --with-target-libiberty needed? (I'd just rather not.) There should b