Re: Remove support for Intel MIC offloading (was: [PATCH] Remove dead code.)

2023-02-01 Thread Martin Jambor
Hello, On Thu, Oct 20 2022, Richard Biener via Gcc-patches wrote: >> Am 20.10.2022 um 14:41 schrieb Jakub Jelinek via Gcc-patches >> : >> >> On Thu, Oct 20, 2022 at 12:33:28PM +, Michael Matz wrote: >>> Hey, >>> On Thu, 20 Oct 2022, Thomas Schwinge wrote: This had been done

Re: Remove support for Intel MIC offloading (was: [PATCH] Remove dead code.)

2022-10-20 Thread Richard Biener via Gcc-patches
> Am 20.10.2022 um 14:41 schrieb Jakub Jelinek via Gcc-patches > : > > On Thu, Oct 20, 2022 at 12:33:28PM +, Michael Matz wrote: >> Hey, >> >>> On Thu, 20 Oct 2022, Thomas Schwinge wrote: >>> >>> This had been done in >>> wwwdocs commit 5c7ecfb5627e412a3d142d8dc212f4cd39b3b73f >>> "Docu

Re: Remove support for Intel MIC offloading (was: [PATCH] Remove dead code.)

2022-10-20 Thread Jakub Jelinek via Gcc-patches
On Thu, Oct 20, 2022 at 12:33:28PM +, Michael Matz wrote: > Hey, > > On Thu, 20 Oct 2022, Thomas Schwinge wrote: > > > This had been done in > > wwwdocs commit 5c7ecfb5627e412a3d142d8dc212f4cd39b3b73f > > "Document deprecation of OpenMP MIC offloading in GCC 12". > > > > I'm sad about this,

Re: Remove support for Intel MIC offloading (was: [PATCH] Remove dead code.)

2022-10-20 Thread Michael Matz via Gcc-patches
Hey, On Thu, 20 Oct 2022, Thomas Schwinge wrote: > This had been done in > wwwdocs commit 5c7ecfb5627e412a3d142d8dc212f4cd39b3b73f > "Document deprecation of OpenMP MIC offloading in GCC 12". > > I'm sad about this, because -- in theory -- such a plugin is very useful > for offloading simulation

Re: Remove support for Intel MIC offloading (was: [PATCH] Remove dead code.)

2022-10-20 Thread Jakub Jelinek via Gcc-patches
On Thu, Oct 20, 2022 at 01:15:43PM +0200, Thomas Schwinge wrote: > I'm proposing the attached "Remove support for Intel MIC offloading" > (generated with 'git format-patch --irreversible-delete', and 'diff's for > regenerated files manually snipped, to reduce its size). ChangeLog missing, you'll n