>
> So this counts all calls in the function we want to inline (!?).
> That's completely
> backward to me. In fact for forwarder functions you still only allow half
> of the early-inlining-insns growth. Previously for non-leafs we didn't allow
> any growth (hm, why?).
Well, the idea is that inl
On Mon, Nov 5, 2012 at 12:23 PM, Jan Hubicka wrote:
> Hi,
> in 4.6 timeframe I limited early inlier growth to apply only for leaf
> functions.
> This does not work really well, because with less propagation of address
> expressions
> we are really not 100% succesfull on detecting C++ forwarders
