> This works though, ok for trunk?
>
> 2016-03-03 Jakub Jelinek
>
> PR ada/70017
> * gcc.dg/pr70017.c (foo): Store 0 to first element of each array.
Sure, thanks.
--
Eric Botcazou
On Thu, Mar 03, 2016 at 12:31:52PM +0100, Eric Botcazou wrote:
> > Anyway, looking at pro_and_epilogue dumps, with additional
> > -fstack-protector-strong we decrease sp only by 4176, while without it by
> > 8224 (on x86_64; the testcase fails on all targets I've tried so far
> > ({x86_64,i686,powe
> Anyway, looking at pro_and_epilogue dumps, with additional
> -fstack-protector-strong we decrease sp only by 4176, while without it by
> 8224 (on x86_64; the testcase fails on all targets I've tried so far
> ({x86_64,i686,powerpc64{,le},s390{,x},aarch64,armv7hl}-linux).
Yeah, the threshold is ar
On Thu, Mar 03, 2016 at 07:46:49AM +0100, Jakub Jelinek wrote:
> On Tue, Mar 01, 2016 at 09:04:54PM +0100, Eric Botcazou wrote:
> > When stack checking is entirely done by the middle-end (default if no
> > specific
> > back-end support or forced by -fstack-check=generic), the checking for the
>
On Tue, Mar 01, 2016 at 09:04:54PM +0100, Eric Botcazou wrote:
> When stack checking is entirely done by the middle-end (default if no
> specific
> back-end support or forced by -fstack-check=generic), the checking for the
> prologue is actually done in the caller with a default range and the ho
