Re: Re: Fortran, committed: Forall-with-temporary problems(pr 50069 and pr 55086).

2017-01-20 Thread Christophe Lyon
On 20 January 2017 at 00:27, Louis Krupp wrote: > I was able to reproduce this on my x86 box by doing "make -k check". > Apparently, "make check-fortran" wasn't enough to catch all of the > consequences of changing gcc/fortran/lang.opt. > > The problem was the help text associated with the -ftes

Re: Re: Fortran, committed: Forall-with-temporary problems(pr 50069 and pr 55086).

2017-01-19 Thread Louis Krupp
I was able to reproduce this on my x86 box by doing "make -k check". Apparently, "make check-fortran" wasn't enough to catch all of the consequences of changing gcc/fortran/lang.opt. The problem was the help text associated with the -ftest-forall-temp option; it needed to end with a period, and