...oh, and keep the current approach if riscv-autovec-lmul=dynamic.
Makes perfect sense - thanks!
On Mon, Dec 11, 2023 at 3:01 PM 钟居哲 wrote:
> I think we should leave it to user choice.
>
> --param=riscv-autovec-lmul=m1/m2/m4/m8/dynamic.
>
> So use TARGET_MAX_LMUL should be more reasonable.
>
>
I think we should leave it to user choice.
--param=riscv-autovec-lmul=m1/m2/m4/m8/dynamic.
So use TARGET_MAX_LMUL should be more reasonable.
juzhe.zh...@rivai.ai
From: Sergei Lewis
Date: 2023-12-11 22:58
To: juzhe.zh...@rivai.ai
CC: gcc-patches; Robin Dapp; Kito.cheng; jeffreyalaw
Subject: R
