Yeah, I agree with you that it makes the pass looks confusing that if we are
mixing FOR_EACH_BB and for (const bb_info *bb...
But Jeff feels happy if I use FOR_EACH_BB so I send a patch to change the
iterator form if it doesn't care about the order.
In this patch, it's ok for both FOR_EACH_BB and
Hi, I fixed that form like you said:
https://gcc.gnu.org/pipermail/gcc-patches/2022-December/609217.html
juzhe.zh...@rivai.ai
From: Jeff Law
Date: 2022-12-28 09:11
To: 钟居哲
CC: gcc-patches; kito.cheng; palmer
Subject: Re: [PATCH] RISC-V: Fix ICE of visiting non-existing block in CFG.
On 1
OK, I will change that after I finished my current work.
juzhe.zh...@rivai.ai
From: Jeff Law
Date: 2022-12-28 08:06
To: juzhe.zhong
CC: gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org; kito.ch...@gmail.com; pal...@dabbelt.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH] RISC-V: Fix ICE of visiting non-existing block in CFG.
On 12/27/22
