Sure. Sent it:
https://gcc.gnu.org/pipermail/gcc-patches/2023-June/622836.html
juzhe.zh...@rivai.ai
From: Kito Cheng
Date: 2023-06-26 17:10
To: Robin Dapp
CC: Juzhe-Zhong; gcc-patches; kito.cheng; palmer; palmer; jeffreyalaw
Subject: Re: [PATCH] RISC-V: Enhance RVV VLA SLP auto-vectorization
No, I don't think we can use first case (vid + vand -npatterns) for base != 0,
since the first element value of vid is alway 0.
Thanks.
juzhe.zh...@rivai.ai
From: Robin Dapp
Date: 2023-06-26 15:51
To: Juzhe-Zhong; gcc-patches
CC: rdapp.gcc; kito.cheng; kito.cheng; palmer; palmer; jeffreyalaw
S
I didn't take a close review yet, (and I suspect I can't find time
before I start my vacation :P), but I am thinking we may adding
selftests for expand_const_vector in *future*, again, not blocker for
this patch :)
On Mon, Jun 12, 2023 at 10:51 PM 钟居哲 wrote:
>
> No. Such pattern you pointed I alr
No. Such pattern you pointed I already supported.
The operation is very simple.
Just use a single vmv.v.i but larger SEW is enough. No need vzext.
juzhe.zh...@rivai.ai
From: Robin Dapp
Date: 2023-06-12 22:43
To: juzhe.zhong; gcc-patches
CC: rdapp.gcc; kito.cheng; kito.cheng; palmer; palmer; je
