>
> Oct 31, 2011 11:56:59 AM, ja...@redhat.com wrote:
>
> On 10/30/2011 01:13 PM, Ed Smith-Rowland wrote:
> > + /* Look for a literal operator taking the exact type of numeric argument
> > + as the literal value. */
>
> Is this right? Do numeric literals only get here with type unsigned
Oct 26, 2011 03:39:09 PM, ja...@redhat.com wrote:
On 10/26/2011 02:00 AM, Ed Smith-Rowland wrote:
> The patch was bootstrapped and regtested on x86_64-linux-gnu.
Really? I ran into a warning about the unused "suffix" parameter to
interpret_integer. So I've fixed that error. I also added a
