Hi
> Could you point me to the bugzilla entry you are mentioning ?
libstdc++/29988
Thanks,
Paolo
On 01/08/2014 02:34 PM, Paolo Carlini wrote:
Hi,
On 12/27/2013 07:30 PM, François Dumont wrote:
Note that this patch contains also a cleanup of a useless template
parameter _Is_pod_comparator on _Rb_tree_impl.
The useless parameter is a remnant of an attempt at exploiting the EBO
for _Rb_tree_
On 01/08/2014 02:34 PM, Paolo Carlini wrote:
Hi,
On 12/27/2013 07:30 PM, François Dumont wrote:
Note that this patch contains also a cleanup of a useless template
parameter _Is_pod_comparator on _Rb_tree_impl.
The useless parameter is a remnant of an attempt at exploiting the EBO
for _Rb_tree_
Hi,
On 12/27/2013 07:30 PM, François Dumont wrote:
Note that this patch contains also a cleanup of a useless template
parameter _Is_pod_comparator on _Rb_tree_impl.
The useless parameter is a remnant of an attempt at exploiting the EBO
for _Rb_tree_impl. At some point Benjamin got a patch from
On 27 December 2013 18:30, François Dumont wrote:
> Hi
>
> Here is a patch to add recycling of Rb tree nodes when possible.
The change looks good, but it is not a bug fix, so I don't think it's
suitable for Stage 3. Please re-submit this after 4.9 is released
when we are in Stage 1 again, tha
Thanks for your feedback.
I considered my patch enough tested because it impacts basic
operations on the Rb tree containers. There are also a number of tests
that are normally dedicated to exception safety but that has the
advantage of challenging numerous containers operations in a generi
Personally, I consider the testing insufficent, although the testing
was already insufficient! Note that this is my opinion, don't assume I
talk for all of libstdc++!
After I broke std::nth_element in 4.8.2 (woops), I am of the view that
the libstdc++ testsuite is defficient -- many code paths are
