Re: RFC: Using DECL_NO_LIMIT_STACK as a backend specific flag

2012-10-04 Thread Richard Guenther
On Wed, Oct 3, 2012 at 5:20 PM, nick clifton wrote: > Hi Ian, > > >> Can't you just keep a list of the decls for which you have issued the >> warning? > > > Yes - that would work too. In fact I agree that this would be cleaner > solution in my particular case. I'll create a new patch... > > > >>

Re: RFC: Using DECL_NO_LIMIT_STACK as a backend specific flag

2012-10-03 Thread nick clifton
Hi Ian, Can't you just keep a list of the decls for which you have issued the warning? Yes - that would work too. In fact I agree that this would be cleaner solution in my particular case. I'll create a new patch... How many decls do you expect to be on that list? Not very many. Mayb

Re: RFC: Using DECL_NO_LIMIT_STACK as a backend specific flag

2012-10-03 Thread Ian Lance Taylor
On Wed, Oct 3, 2012 at 6:31 AM, Nick Clifton wrote: > > Is there a target specific way to add a flag bit to a function decl ? > > For the RX port I want to be able to mark a function decl for which I > have issued a warning message. Unfortunately I could find no easy way > to do this othe