On Sun, Mar 18, 2012 at 3:17 PM, Gerald Pfeifer wrote:
> On Wed, 14 Mar 2012, H.J. Lu wrote:
>>> Apart from the above, at least invoke.texi does not define what an x32
>>> environment is. Shouldn't that done somewhere (before this terminology
>>> is used)?
>> I am not sure where to put it. In an
On Wed, 14 Mar 2012, H.J. Lu wrote:
>> Apart from the above, at least invoke.texi does not define what an x32
>> environment is. Shouldn't that done somewhere (before this terminology
>> is used)?
> I am not sure where to put it. In any case, here is a patch to update
> GCC 4.7.0 changes with lin
On Wed, Mar 14, 2012 at 2:57 PM, Gerald Pfeifer wrote:
> On Wed, 14 Mar 2012, Uros Bizjak wrote:
>> I have also added Gerald to CC, to check if everything is OK with
>> added documentation.
>
> Joseph is better with that than I am, but I'll give it a try. :-)
>
> +@item -maddress-mode=long
> +@opi
On Wed, 14 Mar 2012, Uros Bizjak wrote:
> I have also added Gerald to CC, to check if everything is OK with
> added documentation.
Joseph is better with that than I am, but I'll give it a try. :-)
+@item -maddress-mode=long
+@opindex maddress-mode=long
+Generate code for long address mode. It is
On Wed, 14 Mar 2012, Uros Bizjak wrote:
> The patch is technically OK for mainline, Joseph - can you please
> review option stuff?
The option changes look fine to me.
--
Joseph S. Myers
jos...@codesourcery.com
On Mon, Mar 12, 2012 at 6:48 PM, H.J. Lu wrote:
> Trunk can now use SImode or DImode for Pmode with -mx32. Pmode == SImode
> will avoid many conversions from SImode to DImode:
>
> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50797
>
> It will use 0x67 address size prefix instead. This patch adds
