On 01/09/2012 07:45 AM, Bernd Schmidt wrote:
On 12/23/2011 12:46 PM, Richard Sandiford wrote:
In the end I tried an ad-hoc approach in an attempt to do something
about (2), (3) and (4b). The idea was to construct a preliminary
"model" schedule in which the only objective is to keep register
pre
On 12/28/2011 08:51 AM, Richard Sandiford wrote:
Vladimir Makarov writes:
In the end I tried an ad-hoc approach in an attempt to do something
about (2), (3) and (4b). The idea was to construct a preliminary
"model" schedule in which the only objective is to keep register
pressure to a minimum.
On 12/23/2011 12:46 PM, Richard Sandiford wrote:
> In the end I tried an ad-hoc approach in an attempt to do something
> about (2), (3) and (4b). The idea was to construct a preliminary
> "model" schedule in which the only objective is to keep register
> pressure to a minimum. This schedule ignor
Vladimir Makarov writes:
>> In the end I tried an ad-hoc approach in an attempt to do something
>> about (2), (3) and (4b). The idea was to construct a preliminary
>> "model" schedule in which the only objective is to keep register
>> pressure to a minimum. This schedule ignores pipeline charact
On 12/23/2011 06:46 AM, Richard Sandiford wrote:
So it looks like two pieces of work related to scheduling and register
pressure are being posted close together. This one is an RFC for a less
aggressive form of -fsched-pressure. I think it should complement
rather than compete with Bernd's IRA
On Fri, Dec 23, 2011 at 12:46 PM, Richard Sandiford
wrote:
> So it looks like two pieces of work related to scheduling and register
> pressure are being posted close together. This one is an RFC for a less
> aggressive form of -fsched-pressure. I think it should complement
> rather than compete
