On Mon, May 23, 2011 at 04:21:38PM +0100, Nick Clifton wrote:
> The problem here is that GCC has decided that since "g" is protected
> it does not need a PLT entry.
Right.
> But the linker has decided that since
> "g" is a function it does need a PLT entry (even though it is
> protected)
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 05/23/11 09:21, Nick Clifton wrote:
> Hi Alex, Hi Jeff, Hi Richard,
>
> Consider the following small test case:
>
> % cat test1.c
> extern int g (void) __attribute__ ((visibility("protected")));
> int f (void) { return g (); }
>
>
