Re: RFA: RL78: Remove far operand optimization in rl78_force_nonfar_3

2015-08-05 Thread Nick Clifton
Hi DJ, This is OK, but note that it prevents some operations like: __far int i; foo() { i ++; } from being implemented with a minimum set of opcodes. This might be particularly troublesome for volatile far things. Right - it is something I will have to look into. Cheers Nick

Re: RFA: RL78: Remove far operand optimization in rl78_force_nonfar_3

2015-08-04 Thread DJ Delorie
This is OK, but note that it prevents some operations like: __far int i; foo() { i ++; } from being implemented with a minimum set of opcodes. This might be particularly troublesome for volatile far things.