Re: RFA: PATCH to store_field for storing a CONSTRUCTOR into a base subobject

2015-10-29 Thread Renlin Li
Hi Jason, On 08/10/15 03:42, Jason Merrill wrote: While looking at another issue I noticed that in g++.dg/init/vbase1.C the Diamond(int) constructor was unnecessarily storing a CONSTRUCTOR into a stack temporary and then copying it into the SubB base subobject rather than directly storing the

Re: RFA: PATCH to store_field for storing a CONSTRUCTOR into a base subobject

2015-10-09 Thread Jeff Law
On 10/07/2015 08:42 PM, Jason Merrill wrote: While looking at another issue I noticed that in g++.dg/init/vbase1.C the Diamond(int) constructor was unnecessarily storing a CONSTRUCTOR into a stack temporary and then copying it into the SubB base subobject rather than directly storing the CONSTRUC

Re: RFA: PATCH to store_field for storing a CONSTRUCTOR into a base subobject

2015-10-09 Thread Richard Biener
On Thu, Oct 8, 2015 at 4:42 AM, Jason Merrill wrote: > While looking at another issue I noticed that in g++.dg/init/vbase1.C the > Diamond(int) constructor was unnecessarily storing a CONSTRUCTOR into a > stack temporary and then copying it into the SubB base subobject rather than > directly stori