> On 2014-06-16, 12:12 PM, Robert Suchanek wrote:
> > Pinging for approval.
> >
> > This part of the patch will be needed for MIPS16. The second part to
> enable
> > LRA in MIPS has been already approved.
> >
>
>Sorry, Robert. I thought you are waiting for some Richard's comment
> (actually h
On 2014-06-16, 12:12 PM, Robert Suchanek wrote:
Pinging for approval.
This part of the patch will be needed for MIPS16. The second part to enable
LRA in MIPS has been already approved.
Sorry, Robert. I thought you are waiting for some Richard's comment
(actually he knows the code well and
Pinging for approval.
This part of the patch will be needed for MIPS16. The second part to enable
LRA in MIPS has been already approved.
> Hi Richard,
>
> >> Robert: you also had an LRA change, but is it still needed after this one?
> >> If so, could you repost it and explain the case it handle
Hi Richard,
>> Robert: you also had an LRA change, but is it still needed after this one?
>> If so, could you repost it and explain the case it handles?
For just turning the LRA for the MIPS backend is not needed but we have issues
with the code size for MIPS16. LRA inserted a lot of reloads and
Vladimir Makarov writes:
> On 06/02/2014 03:36 PM, Richard Sandiford wrote:
>> Ping. Imagination's copyright assignment has now gone through and so
>> in principle we're ready for the MIPS LRA switch to go in. We need
>> this LRA patch as a prequisite though.
>>
>> Robert: you also had an LRA ch
On 06/02/2014 03:36 PM, Richard Sandiford wrote:
> Ping. Imagination's copyright assignment has now gone through and so
> in principle we're ready for the MIPS LRA switch to go in. We need
> this LRA patch as a prequisite though.
>
> Robert: you also had an LRA change, but is it still needed afte
