Re: Provide 64-bit default Solaris/x86 configuration (PR target/39150)

2011-07-08 Thread Rainer Orth
Ian, >>> I committed the libgo patch to the upstream repository. >> >> I completely missed that: at least in https://go.googlecode.com/hg/ >> libtool.m4 isn't present. > > The immediate upstream project for libgo is > https://gofrontend.googlecode.com/hg/ . Most of the files in the libgo > direct

Re: Provide 64-bit default Solaris/x86 configuration (PR target/39150)

2011-07-08 Thread Ian Lance Taylor
Rainer Orth writes: > Ian Lance Taylor writes: > >> Rainer Orth writes: >> >>> All bootstraps have completed without regressions, so I've installed the >>> patch as is, after verifying that the libgo parts aren't present in the >>> upstream Go repo. >> >> I committed the libgo patch to the upst

Re: Provide 64-bit default Solaris/x86 configuration (PR target/39150)

2011-07-08 Thread Rainer Orth
Ian Lance Taylor writes: > Rainer Orth writes: > >> All bootstraps have completed without regressions, so I've installed the >> patch as is, after verifying that the libgo parts aren't present in the >> upstream Go repo. > > I committed the libgo patch to the upstream repository. I completely m

Re: Provide 64-bit default Solaris/x86 configuration (PR target/39150)

2011-07-07 Thread Ian Lance Taylor
Rainer Orth writes: > All bootstraps have completed without regressions, so I've installed the > patch as is, after verifying that the libgo parts aren't present in the > upstream Go repo. I committed the libgo patch to the upstream repository. Thanks. Ian diff -r 70b5a35b2d19 libgo/config/li

Re: Provide 64-bit default Solaris/x86 configuration (PR target/39150)

2011-07-07 Thread Rainer Orth
Rainer Orth writes: > There has long been some clamoring for a amd64-*-solaris2 configuration > similar to sparcv9-sun-solaris2. I've resisted this for quite some > time, primarily because it doubles the maintenance effort of testing > both the 32-bit default and 64-bit default configurations. [

Re: Provide 64-bit default Solaris/x86 configuration (PR target/39150)

2011-07-06 Thread Eric Botcazou
> Thanks, I'll give it a try. I just seemd weird to have MASK_V8PLUS and > MASK_V9 at the same time. Yes, that's why the existing comment should also be enhanced. I'll fix it. -- Eric Botcazou

Re: Provide 64-bit default Solaris/x86 configuration (PR target/39150)

2011-07-06 Thread Rainer Orth
Eric Botcazou writes: >> * In the sparcv9-sun-solaris2.11 builds, the 32-bit libgo tests fail to >> link since they have unresolved references to >> __sync_bool_compare_and_swap_8 and __sync_add_and_fetch_8. I could >> trace this to -mv8plus being missing in that configuration. I'm >> u

Re: Provide 64-bit default Solaris/x86 configuration (PR target/39150)

2011-07-06 Thread Eric Botcazou
> * In the sparcv9-sun-solaris2.11 builds, the 32-bit libgo tests fail to > link since they have unresolved references to > __sync_bool_compare_and_swap_8 and __sync_add_and_fetch_8. I could > trace this to -mv8plus being missing in that configuration. I'm > uncertain where best to handle