Re: PowerPC: Update long double IEEE 128-bit tests.

2020-11-09 Thread Segher Boessenkool
On Fri, Nov 06, 2020 at 11:45:21PM -0500, Michael Meissner wrote: > On Mon, Nov 02, 2020 at 07:00:15PM -0600, Segher Boessenkool wrote: > > > + /* This test is written to test IBM extended double, which is a pair of > > > + doubles. If long double can hold a larger value than a double can, >

Re: PowerPC: Update long double IEEE 128-bit tests.

2020-11-06 Thread Michael Meissner via Gcc-patches
On Mon, Nov 02, 2020 at 07:00:15PM -0600, Segher Boessenkool wrote: > Hi! > > On Thu, Oct 22, 2020 at 06:07:14PM -0400, Michael Meissner wrote: > > This patch fixes 3 tests in the testsuite that fail if long double is set > > to IEEE 128-bit. > > > * c-c++-common/dfp/convert-bfp-11.c: If long

Re: PowerPC: Update long double IEEE 128-bit tests.

2020-11-02 Thread Segher Boessenkool
Hi! On Thu, Oct 22, 2020 at 06:07:14PM -0400, Michael Meissner wrote: > This patch fixes 3 tests in the testsuite that fail if long double is set > to IEEE 128-bit. > * c-c++-common/dfp/convert-bfp-11.c: If long double is IEEE > 128-bit, skip the test. > --- a/gcc/testsuite/c-c++-com

Re: PowerPC: Update long double IEEE 128-bit tests.

2020-10-27 Thread will schmidt via Gcc-patches
On Thu, 2020-10-22 at 18:07 -0400, Michael Meissner via Gcc-patches wrote: > PowerPC: Update long double IEEE 128-bit tests. > > I have split all of these patches into separate patches to hopefully get them > into the tree. > > This patch fixes 3 tests in the testsuite that fail if long double is