FYI.
Committed this last patch as:
https://jira.oci.oraclecorp.com/browse/OLDIS-21095
I will come up with the update to gcc-13/changes.html for -fstrict-flex-arrays
very soon.
Thanks.
Qing
> On Dec 16, 2022, at 9:49 AM, Qing Zhao via Gcc-patches
> wrote:
>
>
>
>> On Dec 16, 2022, at 4:17
> On Dec 16, 2022, at 4:17 AM, Richard Biener wrote:
>
> On Thu, 15 Dec 2022, Qing Zhao wrote:
>
>>
>>
>>> On Dec 15, 2022, at 2:47 AM, Richard Biener wrote:
>>>
>>> On Wed, 14 Dec 2022, Qing Zhao wrote:
>>>
Hi, Richard,
I guess that we now agreed on the following:
>
On Thu, 15 Dec 2022, Qing Zhao wrote:
>
>
> > On Dec 15, 2022, at 2:47 AM, Richard Biener wrote:
> >
> > On Wed, 14 Dec 2022, Qing Zhao wrote:
> >
> >> Hi, Richard,
> >>
> >> I guess that we now agreed on the following:
> >>
> >> “ the information that we ran into a trailing array but didn'
> On Dec 15, 2022, at 2:47 AM, Richard Biener wrote:
>
> On Wed, 14 Dec 2022, Qing Zhao wrote:
>
>> Hi, Richard,
>>
>> I guess that we now agreed on the following:
>>
>> “ the information that we ran into a trailing array but didn't consider
>> it a flex array because of -fstrict-flex-array
On Wed, 14 Dec 2022, Qing Zhao wrote:
> Hi, Richard,
>
> I guess that we now agreed on the following:
>
> “ the information that we ran into a trailing array but didn't consider
> it a flex array because of -fstrict-flex-arrays is always a useful
> information”
>
> The only thing we didn’t de
Hi, Richard,
I guess that we now agreed on the following:
“ the information that we ran into a trailing array but didn't consider
it a flex array because of -fstrict-flex-arrays is always a useful information”
The only thing we didn’t decide is:
A. Amend such new information to -Warray-bounds
> On Dec 14, 2022, at 9:08 AM, Qing Zhao via Gcc-patches
> wrote:
>
>
>
>> On Dec 14, 2022, at 4:03 AM, Richard Biener wrote:
>>
>> On Tue, 13 Dec 2022, Qing Zhao wrote:
>>
>>> Richard,
>>>
>>> Do you have any decision on this one?
>>> Do we need this warning option For GCC?
>>
>> Lo
> On Dec 14, 2022, at 4:03 AM, Richard Biener wrote:
>
> On Tue, 13 Dec 2022, Qing Zhao wrote:
>
>> Richard,
>>
>> Do you have any decision on this one?
>> Do we need this warning option For GCC?
>
> Looking at the testcases it seems that the diagnostic amends
> -Warray-bounds diagnostics
On Tue, 13 Dec 2022, Qing Zhao wrote:
> Richard,
>
> Do you have any decision on this one?
> Do we need this warning option For GCC?
Looking at the testcases it seems that the diagnostic amends
-Warray-bounds diagnostics for trailing but not flexible arrays?
Wouldn't it be better to generally
