RE: Ping^2: [PATCH]Remove duplicate check on BRANCH_COST in fold-const.c

2012-09-18 Thread Bin Cheng
> -Original Message- > From: Richard Guenther [mailto:richard.guent...@gmail.com] > Sent: Tuesday, September 18, 2012 5:50 PM > To: Bin Cheng > Cc: Bin.Cheng; gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org; Richard Earnshaw > Subject: Re: Ping^2: [PATCH]Remove duplicate check on BRANCH_COST

Re: Ping^2: [PATCH]Remove duplicate check on BRANCH_COST in fold-const.c

2012-09-18 Thread Richard Guenther
Tuesday, September 04, 2012 11:20 PM >> To: Richard Guenther; gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org >> Cc: Richard Earnshaw >> Subject: Re: Ping^2: [PATCH]Remove duplicate check on BRANCH_COST in fold- >> const.c >> >> Sorry, I mis-sent this offline. >> >> On Tue, Se

RE: Ping^2: [PATCH]Remove duplicate check on BRANCH_COST in fold-const.c

2012-09-18 Thread Bin Cheng
Ping^2: [PATCH]Remove duplicate check on BRANCH_COST in fold- > const.c > > Sorry, I mis-sent this offline. > > On Tue, Sep 4, 2012 at 11:00 PM, Bin.Cheng wrote: > >>> > >>> It's not ok (I btw fail to see the patch in this thread). The > >>> curr

Re: Ping^2: [PATCH]Remove duplicate check on BRANCH_COST in fold-const.c

2012-09-04 Thread Bin.Cheng
Sorry, I mis-sent this offline. On Tue, Sep 4, 2012 at 11:00 PM, Bin.Cheng wrote: >>> >>> It's not ok (I btw fail to see the patch in this thread). The current >>> way LOGICAL_OP_NON_SHORT_CIRCUIT is implemented/used should instead >>> be changed to always match the pattern >>> >>> LOGICAL

Re: Ping^2: [PATCH]Remove duplicate check on BRANCH_COST in fold-const.c

2012-09-04 Thread Richard Guenther
On Tue, Sep 4, 2012 at 4:33 PM, Richard Earnshaw wrote: > On 04/09/12 15:31, Richard Guenther wrote: >> On Tue, Sep 4, 2012 at 12:53 PM, Richard Earnshaw wrote: >>> On 04/09/12 11:11, Richard Guenther wrote: On Tue, Sep 4, 2012 at 11:56 AM, Bin Cheng wrote: >>> -Original Message

Re: Ping^2: [PATCH]Remove duplicate check on BRANCH_COST in fold-const.c

2012-09-04 Thread Richard Earnshaw
On 04/09/12 15:31, Richard Guenther wrote: > On Tue, Sep 4, 2012 at 12:53 PM, Richard Earnshaw wrote: >> On 04/09/12 11:11, Richard Guenther wrote: >>> On Tue, Sep 4, 2012 at 11:56 AM, Bin Cheng wrote: >> -Original Message- >> From: Richard Earnshaw >> Sent: Thursday, July 26,

Re: Ping^2: [PATCH]Remove duplicate check on BRANCH_COST in fold-const.c

2012-09-04 Thread Richard Guenther
On Tue, Sep 4, 2012 at 12:53 PM, Richard Earnshaw wrote: > On 04/09/12 11:11, Richard Guenther wrote: >> On Tue, Sep 4, 2012 at 11:56 AM, Bin Cheng wrote: > -Original Message- > From: Richard Earnshaw > Sent: Thursday, July 26, 2012 9:19 PM > To: Andrew Pinski > Cc: Bi

Re: Ping^2: [PATCH]Remove duplicate check on BRANCH_COST in fold-const.c

2012-09-04 Thread Richard Earnshaw
On 04/09/12 11:11, Richard Guenther wrote: > On Tue, Sep 4, 2012 at 11:56 AM, Bin Cheng wrote: -Original Message- From: Richard Earnshaw Sent: Thursday, July 26, 2012 9:19 PM To: Andrew Pinski Cc: Bin Cheng; gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org Subject: Re: [PATCH]Remove d

Re: Ping^2: [PATCH]Remove duplicate check on BRANCH_COST in fold-const.c

2012-09-04 Thread Richard Guenther
On Tue, Sep 4, 2012 at 11:56 AM, Bin Cheng wrote: >> > -Original Message- >> > From: Richard Earnshaw >> > Sent: Thursday, July 26, 2012 9:19 PM >> > To: Andrew Pinski >> > Cc: Bin Cheng; gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org >> > Subject: Re: [PATCH]Remove duplicate check on BRANCH_COST in >> > fold-co