Re: PR65217.c, improve canonicalization of implied copy from equality comparison

2015-04-28 Thread Jeff Law
On 04/28/2015 01:15 AM, Marek Polacek wrote: On Mon, Apr 27, 2015 at 10:07:46PM -0600, Jeff Law wrote: Thanks for the nice summary in the first part of the mail. Two typos: + /* Most of the time tree_swap_operands_p does what we want. But there's Shouldn't that be "there are"? + cas

Re: PR65217.c, improve canonicalization of implied copy from equality comparison

2015-04-28 Thread Marek Polacek
On Mon, Apr 27, 2015 at 10:07:46PM -0600, Jeff Law wrote: Thanks for the nice summary in the first part of the mail. Two typos: > + /* Most of the time tree_swap_operands_p does what we want. But there's Shouldn't that be "there are"? > + cases where we we know one operand is better for