On Wed, 18 Oct 2023 at 23:22, Richard Sandiford
wrote:
>
> Prathamesh Kulkarni writes:
> > On Tue, 17 Oct 2023 at 02:40, Richard Sandiford
> > wrote:
> >> Prathamesh Kulkarni writes:
> >> > diff --git a/gcc/fold-const.cc b/gcc/fold-const.cc
> >> > index 4f8561509ff..55a6a68c16c 100644
> >> > --
Prathamesh Kulkarni writes:
> On Tue, 17 Oct 2023 at 02:40, Richard Sandiford
> wrote:
>> Prathamesh Kulkarni writes:
>> > diff --git a/gcc/fold-const.cc b/gcc/fold-const.cc
>> > index 4f8561509ff..55a6a68c16c 100644
>> > --- a/gcc/fold-const.cc
>> > +++ b/gcc/fold-const.cc
>> > @@ -10684,9 +106
On Tue, 17 Oct 2023 at 02:40, Richard Sandiford
wrote:
>
> Prathamesh Kulkarni writes:
> > On Wed, 11 Oct 2023 at 16:57, Prathamesh Kulkarni
> > wrote:
> >>
> >> On Wed, 11 Oct 2023 at 16:42, Prathamesh Kulkarni
> >> wrote:
> >> >
> >> > On Mon, 9 Oct 2023 at 17:05, Richard Sandiford
> >> > wr
Prathamesh Kulkarni writes:
> On Wed, 11 Oct 2023 at 16:57, Prathamesh Kulkarni
> wrote:
>>
>> On Wed, 11 Oct 2023 at 16:42, Prathamesh Kulkarni
>> wrote:
>> >
>> > On Mon, 9 Oct 2023 at 17:05, Richard Sandiford
>> > wrote:
>> > >
>> > > Prathamesh Kulkarni writes:
>> > > > Hi,
>> > > > The at
On Wed, 11 Oct 2023 at 16:57, Prathamesh Kulkarni
wrote:
>
> On Wed, 11 Oct 2023 at 16:42, Prathamesh Kulkarni
> wrote:
> >
> > On Mon, 9 Oct 2023 at 17:05, Richard Sandiford
> > wrote:
> > >
> > > Prathamesh Kulkarni writes:
> > > > Hi,
> > > > The attached patch attempts to fix PR111648.
> >
On Wed, 11 Oct 2023 at 16:42, Prathamesh Kulkarni
wrote:
>
> On Mon, 9 Oct 2023 at 17:05, Richard Sandiford
> wrote:
> >
> > Prathamesh Kulkarni writes:
> > > Hi,
> > > The attached patch attempts to fix PR111648.
> > > As mentioned in PR, the issue is when a1 is a multiple of vector
> > > lengt
On Mon, 9 Oct 2023 at 17:05, Richard Sandiford
wrote:
>
> Prathamesh Kulkarni writes:
> > Hi,
> > The attached patch attempts to fix PR111648.
> > As mentioned in PR, the issue is when a1 is a multiple of vector
> > length, we end up creating following encoding in result: { base_elem,
> > arg[0],
Prathamesh Kulkarni writes:
> Hi,
> The attached patch attempts to fix PR111648.
> As mentioned in PR, the issue is when a1 is a multiple of vector
> length, we end up creating following encoding in result: { base_elem,
> arg[0], arg[1], ... } (assuming S = 1),
> where arg is chosen input vector,