On 01/04/2012 08:19 AM, Aldy Hernandez wrote:
> PR middle-end/51696
> * trans-mem.c (diagnose_tm_1): Display indirect calls with no name
> correctly.
Ok.
r~
On 01/03/12 14:01, Richard Henderson wrote:
On 01/04/2012 04:18 AM, Aldy Hernandez wrote:
PR middle-end/51696
* trans-mem.c (diagnose_tm_1): Display indirect calls with no name
correctly.
Ok.
r~
Sorry for the noise, but I forgot to check that we actually have a DECL
On 01/04/2012 04:18 AM, Aldy Hernandez wrote:
> PR middle-end/51696
> * trans-mem.c (diagnose_tm_1): Display indirect calls with no name
> correctly.
Ok.
r~
On 01/03/12 11:04, Aldy Hernandez wrote:
For the following testcase, we display indirect calls as memory
addresses, which can confuse the user:
struct list {
void (*compare)();
} *listPtr;
static void (*compare)();
__attribute__((transaction_safe))
static void func () {
listPtr->compare();
/* ^^
