OK.
Jason
On Thu, Oct 31, 2013 at 08:34:55AM -0400, Ed Smith-Rowland wrote:
> 2013-10-31 Edward Smith-Rowland <3dw...@verizon.net>
>
> PR c++/58708
> * parser.c (make_string_pack): Discover non-const type and size
> of character and build parm pack with correct type and chars.
>
> gcc
On 10/25/2013 10:40 AM, Jakub Jelinek wrote:
On Fri, Oct 25, 2013 at 10:29:41AM -0400, Ed Smith-Rowland wrote:
2013-10-25 Edward Smith-Rowland <3dw...@verizon.net>
PR c++/58708
* parser.c (make_string_pack): Discover non-const type and size
of character and build parm
On Fri, Oct 25, 2013 at 10:29:41AM -0400, Ed Smith-Rowland wrote:
> 2013-10-25 Edward Smith-Rowland <3dw...@verizon.net>
>
> PR c++/58708
> * parser.c (make_string_pack): Discover non-const type and size
> of character and build parm pack with correct type and chars.
>
> gcc
On 10/25/2013 04:29 PM, Ed Smith-Rowland wrote:
Here is one with necessary tools inlined.
You still have a lot of redundant code... I'm not going to insist anyway.
Paolo.
On 10/25/2013 10:01 AM, Paolo Carlini wrote:
On 10/25/2013 03:46 PM, Ed Smith-Rowland wrote:
On 10/25/2013 07:54 AM, Paolo Carlini wrote:
On 10/25/2013 01:38 PM, Ed Smith-Rowland wrote:
So, you also want a library testcase?
Up to you: if you feel it would test something that the c++
front-end
On 10/25/2013 10:01 AM, Paolo Carlini wrote:
On 10/25/2013 03:46 PM, Ed Smith-Rowland wrote:
On 10/25/2013 07:54 AM, Paolo Carlini wrote:
On 10/25/2013 01:38 PM, Ed Smith-Rowland wrote:
So, you also want a library testcase?
Up to you: if you feel it would test something that the c++
front-end
On 10/25/2013 03:46 PM, Ed Smith-Rowland wrote:
On 10/25/2013 07:54 AM, Paolo Carlini wrote:
On 10/25/2013 01:38 PM, Ed Smith-Rowland wrote:
So, you also want a library testcase?
Up to you: if you feel it would test something that the c++ front-end
testcase doesn't, why not.
Paolo.
I think
On 10/25/2013 07:54 AM, Paolo Carlini wrote:
On 10/25/2013 01:38 PM, Ed Smith-Rowland wrote:
So, you also want a library testcase?
Up to you: if you feel it would test something that the c++ front-end
testcase doesn't, why not.
Paolo.
I think this patch should be sufficient - no containers,
On 10/25/2013 01:38 PM, Ed Smith-Rowland wrote:
So, you also want a library testcase?
Up to you: if you feel it would test something that the c++ front-end
testcase doesn't, why not.
Paolo.
On 10/25/2013 06:08 AM, Paolo Carlini wrote:
Hi,
On 10/18/2013 04:42 AM, Ed Smith-Rowland wrote:
--- testsuite/g++.dg/cpp1y/pr58708.C (revision 0)
+++ testsuite/g++.dg/cpp1y/pr58708.C(working copy)
@@ -0,0 +1,70 @@
+// { dg-options -std=c++1y }
+
+#include
+#include
+#include
+#include
Hi,
On 10/18/2013 04:42 AM, Ed Smith-Rowland wrote:
--- testsuite/g++.dg/cpp1y/pr58708.C(revision 0)
+++ testsuite/g++.dg/cpp1y/pr58708.C(working copy)
@@ -0,0 +1,70 @@
+// { dg-options -std=c++1y }
+
+#include
+#include
+#include
+#include
are you sure you want these includes in a C
On 10/18/2013 04:42 AM, Ed Smith-Rowland wrote:
Here is a patch to correct the char type and the type, number of
nontype parameter pack for user defined strng literal operator templates.
Let's make sure Jason is in CC.
Thanks!
Paolo.
13 matches
Mail list logo
