On Mon, May 21, 2012 at 12:56 AM, H.J. Lu wrote:
>>> #include
>>>
>>> int
>>> main(int argc, char **argv)
>>> {
>>> unsigned int number = 0;
>>> int result0, result1, result2, result3;
>>>
>>> result0 = __builtin_ia32_rdrand32_step (&number);
>>> result1 = __builtin_ia32_rdrand32_step (&n
On Sun, May 20, 2012 at 12:03 PM, Uros Bizjak wrote:
> On Sun, May 20, 2012 at 8:43 PM, Andrew Pinski wrote:
>
>> #include
>>
>> int
>> main(int argc, char **argv)
>> {
>> unsigned int number = 0;
>> int result0, result1, result2, result3;
>>
>> result0 = __builtin_ia32_rdrand32_step (&num
On Sun, May 20, 2012 at 8:43 PM, Andrew Pinski wrote:
> #include
>
> int
> main(int argc, char **argv)
> {
> unsigned int number = 0;
> int result0, result1, result2, result3;
>
> result0 = __builtin_ia32_rdrand32_step (&number);
> result1 = __builtin_ia32_rdrand32_step (&number);
> resu
On Sun, May 20, 2012 at 11:37 AM, H.J. Lu wrote:
> On Sun, May 20, 2012 at 11:15 AM, Jakub Jelinek wrote:
>> On Sun, May 20, 2012 at 10:37:13AM -0700, H.J. Lu wrote:
>>> On Sun, May 20, 2012 at 10:19 AM, Jakub Jelinek wrote:
>>> > On Sun, May 20, 2012 at 10:04:26AM -0700, H.J. Lu wrote:
>>> >> r
On Sun, May 20, 2012 at 11:15 AM, Jakub Jelinek wrote:
> On Sun, May 20, 2012 at 10:37:13AM -0700, H.J. Lu wrote:
>> On Sun, May 20, 2012 at 10:19 AM, Jakub Jelinek wrote:
>> > On Sun, May 20, 2012 at 10:04:26AM -0700, H.J. Lu wrote:
>> >> rdrand_1 must be marked with unspec_volatile since it ret
On Sun, May 20, 2012 at 10:37:13AM -0700, H.J. Lu wrote:
> On Sun, May 20, 2012 at 10:19 AM, Jakub Jelinek wrote:
> > On Sun, May 20, 2012 at 10:04:26AM -0700, H.J. Lu wrote:
> >> rdrand_1 must be marked with unspec_volatile since it returns
> >> a different value every time. OK for trunk, 4.7 an
On Sun, May 20, 2012 at 10:19 AM, Jakub Jelinek wrote:
> On Sun, May 20, 2012 at 10:04:26AM -0700, H.J. Lu wrote:
>> rdrand_1 must be marked with unspec_volatile since it returns
>> a different value every time. OK for trunk, 4.7 and 4.6?
>
> A testcase for this would be nice (runtime is not poss
On Sun, May 20, 2012 at 10:04:26AM -0700, H.J. Lu wrote:
> rdrand_1 must be marked with unspec_volatile since it returns
> a different value every time. OK for trunk, 4.7 and 4.6?
A testcase for this would be nice (runtime is not possible, since the
RNG in theory could return the same value twice
