On 3/26/19 8:35 AM, Maxim Kuvyrkov wrote:
I don't follow. Do you mean that in the below testcase it's not guaranteed
that casp will get its first two arguments in x0 and x1? (If so, why?)
Sorry for not to be clear. With my first patch only, it was not
guaranteed for some complicated code ca
> On Mar 26, 2019, at 3:20 PM, Vladimir Makarov wrote:
>
> On 3/26/19 4:25 AM, Maxim Kuvyrkov wrote:
>>> On Mar 26, 2019, at 12:22 AM, Vladimir Makarov wrote:
>>>
>>> Jeff Law recently found that my latest patch break some existing code
>>> compilation (the code is big to make test out of
On 3/26/19 4:25 AM, Maxim Kuvyrkov wrote:
On Mar 26, 2019, at 12:22 AM, Vladimir Makarov wrote:
Jeff Law recently found that my latest patch break some existing code
compilation (the code is big to make test out of it).
Here is the patch to fix it. The patch was successfully bootstrapped
> On Mar 26, 2019, at 12:22 AM, Vladimir Makarov wrote:
>
> Jeff Law recently found that my latest patch break some existing code
> compilation (the code is big to make test out of it).
>
> Here is the patch to fix it. The patch was successfully bootstrapped on
> x86-64. The patch actually
