Re: New effective-target 'asm_goto_with_outputs'

2024-03-22 Thread Jeff Law
On 3/22/24 12:24 PM, Jakub Jelinek wrote: On Fri, Mar 22, 2024 at 12:17:03PM -0600, Jeff Law wrote: I'd just make target_lra return false for nvptx rather than creating a new The lra effective target currently though doesn't check if asm goto can have outputs, but rather if the target is us

Re: New effective-target 'asm_goto_with_outputs'

2024-03-22 Thread Jakub Jelinek
On Fri, Mar 22, 2024 at 12:17:03PM -0600, Jeff Law wrote: > I'd just make target_lra return false for nvptx rather than creating a new The lra effective target currently though doesn't check if asm goto can have outputs, but rather if the target is using lra. > selector -- I'm not aware of any fe

Re: New effective-target 'asm_goto_with_outputs'

2024-03-22 Thread Jeff Law
On 3/21/24 5:20 AM, Thomas Schwinge wrote: Hi! On 2024-02-16T10:48:53-0800, Mike Stump wrote: On Feb 16, 2024, at 2:16 AM, Jakub Jelinek wrote: There is one special case, NVPTX, which is a TARGET_NO_REGISTER_ALLOCATION target. I think claiming for it that it is a lra target is strange (