On 3/22/24 12:24 PM, Jakub Jelinek wrote:
On Fri, Mar 22, 2024 at 12:17:03PM -0600, Jeff Law wrote:
I'd just make target_lra return false for nvptx rather than creating a new
The lra effective target currently though doesn't check if asm goto can have
outputs, but rather if the target is us
On Fri, Mar 22, 2024 at 12:17:03PM -0600, Jeff Law wrote:
> I'd just make target_lra return false for nvptx rather than creating a new
The lra effective target currently though doesn't check if asm goto can have
outputs, but rather if the target is using lra.
> selector -- I'm not aware of any fe
On 3/21/24 5:20 AM, Thomas Schwinge wrote:
Hi!
On 2024-02-16T10:48:53-0800, Mike Stump wrote:
On Feb 16, 2024, at 2:16 AM, Jakub Jelinek wrote:
There is one special case, NVPTX, which is a TARGET_NO_REGISTER_ALLOCATION
target. I think claiming for it that it is a lra target is strange (