Re: Move reg_equiv* arrays into a single VEC structure

2011-03-31 Thread Jeff Law
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On 03/30/11 10:51, Richard Sandiford wrote: > Nice cleanup thanks. Just noticed a couple of things: > > Jeff Law writes: >> *** struct reload >> *** 100,106 >> int inc; >> /* A reg for which reload_in is the equivalent. >>

Re: Move reg_equiv* arrays into a single VEC structure

2011-03-30 Thread Jeff Law
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On 03/30/11 10:51, Richard Sandiford wrote: > Nice cleanup thanks. Just noticed a couple of things: > > Jeff Law writes: >> *** struct reload >> *** 100,106 >> int inc; >> /* A reg for which reload_in is the equivalent. >>

Re: Move reg_equiv* arrays into a single VEC structure

2011-03-30 Thread H.J. Lu
On Wed, Mar 30, 2011 at 7:23 AM, Jeff Law wrote: > -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- > Hash: SHA1 > > As originally discussed here: > > http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2010-05/msg00987.html > > Changes since the original submission: > > Per Richi's suggestion I changed the patch to use a GC'd V

Re: Move reg_equiv* arrays into a single VEC structure

2011-03-30 Thread Richard Sandiford
Nice cleanup thanks. Just noticed a couple of things: Jeff Law writes: > *** struct reload > *** 100,106 > int inc; > /* A reg for which reload_in is the equivalent. >If reload_in is a symbol_ref which came from > ! reg_equiv_constant, then this is the pseud

Re: Move reg_equiv* arrays into a single VEC structure

2011-03-30 Thread Richard Guenther
On Wed, Mar 30, 2011 at 4:23 PM, Jeff Law wrote: > -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- > Hash: SHA1 > > As originally discussed here: > > http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2010-05/msg00987.html > > Changes since the original submission: > > Per Richi's suggestion I changed the patch to use a GC'd V