> I'm seeing ICEs: »tree check: expected function_decl, have type_decl in
> fold_checksum_tree, at fold-const.c:14861«. Is the following the correct
> fix, or should this be done differently?
No, it seems fine to me. I added it to my local patch, thanks!
Honza
>
> --- gcc/fold-const.c
> +++ gcc
On Thu, Jul 10, 2014 at 11:50 AM, Thomas Schwinge
wrote:
> Hi!
>
> On Mon, 23 Jun 2014 22:25:41 +0200, Jan Hubicka wrote:
>> this patch makes DECL_VINDEX and DECL_SAVED_TREE to be FUNCTION_DECL only.
>
>> Bootstrapped/regtested x86_64-linux, OK?
>
> ... without --enable-checking=fold. ;-P
>
>>
Hi!
On Mon, 23 Jun 2014 22:25:41 +0200, Jan Hubicka wrote:
> this patch makes DECL_VINDEX and DECL_SAVED_TREE to be FUNCTION_DECL only.
> Bootstrapped/regtested x86_64-linux, OK?
... without --enable-checking=fold. ;-P
> * class.c (check_methods, create_vtable_ptr, determine_key_method,
> On 06/24/2014 02:18 PM, Jan Hubicka wrote:
> >>On 06/23/2014 04:25 PM, Jan Hubicka wrote:
> >>> * class.c (check_methods, create_vtable_ptr, determine_key_method,
> >>> add_vcall_offset_vtbl_entries_1): Guard VINDEX checks by FUNCTION_DECL
> >>> check.
> >>
> >>These changes are unnecessary:
On 06/24/2014 02:18 PM, Jan Hubicka wrote:
On 06/23/2014 04:25 PM, Jan Hubicka wrote:
* class.c (check_methods, create_vtable_ptr, determine_key_method,
add_vcall_offset_vtbl_entries_1): Guard VINDEX checks by FUNCTION_DECL
check.
These changes are unnecessary: TYPE_METHODS is
> On 06/23/2014 04:25 PM, Jan Hubicka wrote:
> > * class.c (check_methods, create_vtable_ptr, determine_key_method,
> > add_vcall_offset_vtbl_entries_1): Guard VINDEX checks by FUNCTION_DECL
> > check.
>
> These changes are unnecessary: TYPE_METHODS is a list of functions.
I just double
On 06/23/2014 04:25 PM, Jan Hubicka wrote:
* class.c (check_methods, create_vtable_ptr, determine_key_method,
add_vcall_offset_vtbl_entries_1): Guard VINDEX checks by FUNCTION_DECL
check.
These changes are unnecessary: TYPE_METHODS is a list of functions.
The rest of the patch
