Hi!
On Fri, 6 Nov 2015 12:03:25 +0100, Bernd Schmidt wrote:
> On 11/06/2015 11:30 AM, Richard Biener wrote:
> > On Fri, 6 Nov 2015, Bernd Schmidt wrote:
> >>
> >> Realistically we're probably not going to reject this work, but I still
> >> want
> >> to ask whether the approach was acked by the c
On 11/06/2015 11:30 AM, Richard Biener wrote:
On Fri, 6 Nov 2015, Bernd Schmidt wrote:
Realistically we're probably not going to reject this work, but I still want
to ask whether the approach was acked by the community before you started. I'm
really not exactly thrilled about having two differe
On 11/06/2015 11:12 AM, Bernd Schmidt wrote:
> On 11/05/2015 10:51 PM, Martin Jambor wrote:
>> Individual changes are described in slightly more detail in their
>> respective messages. If you are interested in how the HSAIL
>> generation works in general, I encourage you to have a look at my
>> Ca
On Fri, 6 Nov 2015, Bernd Schmidt wrote:
> On 11/05/2015 10:51 PM, Martin Jambor wrote:
> > Individual changes are described in slightly more detail in their
> > respective messages. If you are interested in how the HSAIL
> > generation works in general, I encourage you to have a look at my
> > C
On 11/05/2015 10:51 PM, Martin Jambor wrote:
Individual changes are described in slightly more detail in their
respective messages. If you are interested in how the HSAIL
generation works in general, I encourage you to have a look at my
Cauldron slides or presentation, only very few things have
