Hi,
On 13 January 2018 at 16:34, Jeff Law wrote:
> On 01/09/2018 08:23 AM, Richard Sandiford wrote:
>> Richard Biener writes:
>>> On Mon, Nov 20, 2017 at 12:31 PM, Bin.Cheng wrote:
On Fri, Nov 17, 2017 at 3:03 PM, Richard Sandiford
wrote:
> ivopts previously treated pointer argu
On 01/09/2018 08:23 AM, Richard Sandiford wrote:
> Richard Biener writes:
>> On Mon, Nov 20, 2017 at 12:31 PM, Bin.Cheng wrote:
>>> On Fri, Nov 17, 2017 at 3:03 PM, Richard Sandiford
>>> wrote:
ivopts previously treated pointer arguments to internal functions
like IFN_MASK_LOAD and IFN
Richard Biener writes:
> On Mon, Nov 20, 2017 at 12:31 PM, Bin.Cheng wrote:
>> On Fri, Nov 17, 2017 at 3:03 PM, Richard Sandiford
>> wrote:
>>> ivopts previously treated pointer arguments to internal functions
>>> like IFN_MASK_LOAD and IFN_MASK_STORE as normal gimple values.
>>> This patch make
On Mon, Nov 20, 2017 at 12:31 PM, Bin.Cheng wrote:
> On Fri, Nov 17, 2017 at 3:03 PM, Richard Sandiford
> wrote:
>> ivopts previously treated pointer arguments to internal functions
>> like IFN_MASK_LOAD and IFN_MASK_STORE as normal gimple values.
>> This patch makes it treat them as addresses in
On Fri, Nov 17, 2017 at 3:03 PM, Richard Sandiford
wrote:
> ivopts previously treated pointer arguments to internal functions
> like IFN_MASK_LOAD and IFN_MASK_STORE as normal gimple values.
> This patch makes it treat them as addresses instead. This makes
> a significant difference to the code q